There are two ways to define a comonad:
I. Provide definitions for extract and extend satisfying these laws:
extend extract = id
extract . extend f = f
extend f . extend g = extend (f . extend g)
In this case, you may simply set fmap = liftW.
These laws are directly analogous to the laws for monads and perhaps can be made clearer by viewing them as laws stating that Cokleisli composition must be associative, and has extract for a unit:
f =>= extract = f
extract =>= f = f
(f =>= g) =>= h = f =>= (g =>= h)
II. Alternately, you may choose to provide definitions for fmap, extract, and duplicate satisfying these laws:
extract . duplicate = id
fmap extract . duplicate = id
duplicate . duplicate = fmap duplicate . duplicate
In this case you may not rely on the ability to define fmap in terms of liftW.
You may of course, choose to define both duplicate and extend. In that case you must also satisfy these laws:
extend f = fmap f . duplicate
duplicate = extend id
fmap f = extend (f . extract)
These are the default definitions of extend and duplicate and the definition of liftW respectively.
Instances12Comonad, …
Comonad TreeDefined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad NonEmptyDefined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad IdentityDefined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad (Arg e)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad (Tuple2 e)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad (Tagged s)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.ComonadComonad w => Comonad (EnvT e w)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad.Trans.EnvComonad w => Comonad (StoreT s w)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad.Trans.StoreComonad w => Comonad (IdentityT w)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad(Comonad w, Monoid m) => Comonad (TracedT m w)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad.Trans.TracedMonoid m => Comonad ((->) m)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad(Comonad f, Comonad g) => Comonad (Sum f g)Defined in comonad-5.0.9 · Control.Comonad