Provide the ability to handle errors of type e.
Instances2DispatchOf, StaticRep
type DispatchOf (Error e) = 'Static 'NoSideEffectsDefined in effectful-core-2.3.0.1 · Effectful.Error.Staticdata StaticRep (Error e)Error ErrorId
:: a typeCtrl KGHC 9.10.3 · lts/ghc-9.10.x · 248f8f0 · 2026-10-05
Moduleeffectful-core-2.3.0.1Haskell2010
Support for handling errors of a particular type, i.e. checked exceptions.
The Error effect is not a general mechanism for handling regular
exceptions, that's what functions from the exceptions library are for (see
Control.Monad.Catch for more information).
In particular, regular exceptions of type e are distinct from errors of
type e and will not be caught by functions from this module:
import qualified Control.Monad.Catch as Eboom = error "BOOM!"runEff . runError @ErrorCall $ boom `catchError` \_ (_::ErrorCall) -> pure "caught"*** Exception: BOOM!...
If you want to catch regular exceptions, you should use catch (or a similar function):
runEff $ boom `E.catch` \(_::ErrorCall) -> pure "caught""caught"
On the other hand, functions for safe finalization and management of resources such as finally and bracket work as expected:
msg = liftIO . putStrLn:{runEff . runErrorNoCallStack @String $ do E.bracket_ (msg "Beginning.") (msg "Cleaning up.") (msg "Computing." >> throwError "oops" >> msg "More."):}Beginning.Computing.Cleaning up.Left "oops"
Note: unlike the ExceptT monad transformer
from the transformers library, the order in which you handle the Error
effect with regard to other stateful effects does not matter. Consider the
following:
import qualified Control.Monad.State.Strict as Timport qualified Control.Monad.Except as T
m1 = (T.modify (++ " there!") >> T.throwError "oops") `T.catchError` \_ -> pure ()(`T.runStateT` "Hi") . T.runExceptT $ m1(Right (),"Hi there!")
T.runExceptT . (`T.runStateT` "Hi") $ m1Right ((),"Hi")
Here, whether state updates within the catchError block are discarded or not depends on the shape of the monad transformer stack, which is surprising and can be a source of subtle bugs. On the other hand:
import Effectful.State.Static.Localm2 = (modify (++ " there!") >> throwError "oops") `catchError` \_ (_::String) -> pure ()runEff . runState "Hi" . runError @String $ m2(Right (),"Hi there!")
runEff . runError @String . runState "Hi" $ m2Right ((),"Hi there!")
Here, no matter the order of effects, state updates made within the
catchError block before the error happens always persist, giving
predictable behavior.
Hint: if you'd like to reproduce the transactional behavior with the State effect, appropriate usage of bracketOnError will do the trick.
Provide the ability to handle errors of type e.
type DispatchOf (Error e) = 'Static 'NoSideEffectsDefined in effectful-core-2.3.0.1 · Effectful.Error.Staticdata StaticRep (Error e)Error ErrorIdHandle errors of type e.
runErrorWith Handle errors of type e with a specific error handler.
Handle errors of type e. In case of an error discard the CallStack.
Handle errors of type e with a specific error handler. In case of an
error discard the CallStack.
Throw an error of type e.
catchError Handle an error of type e.
handleError The same as flip catchError, which is useful in situations where the
code for the handler is shorter.
Similar to catchError, but returns an Either result which is a Right if no error was thrown and a Left otherwise.
Request a CallStack.
NOTE: The implicit parameter ?callStack :: CallStack is an
implementation detail and should not be considered part of the
CallStack API, we may decide to change the implementation in the
future.
CallStacks are a lightweight method of obtaining a partial call-stack at any point in the program.
A function can request its call-site with the HasCallStack constraint. For example, we can define
putStrLnWithCallStack :: HasCallStack => String -> IO ()
as a variant of putStrLn that will get its call-site and print it,
along with the string given as argument. We can access the
call-stack inside putStrLnWithCallStack with callStack.
:{putStrLnWithCallStack :: HasCallStack => String -> IO ()putStrLnWithCallStack msg = do putStrLn msg putStrLn (prettyCallStack callStack):}
Thus, if we call putStrLnWithCallStack we will get a formatted call-stack
alongside our string.
putStrLnWithCallStack "hello"helloCallStack (from HasCallStack): putStrLnWithCallStack, called at <interactive>:... in interactive:Ghci...
GHC solves HasCallStack constraints in three steps:
If there is a CallStack in scope -- i.e. the enclosing function has a HasCallStack constraint -- GHC will append the new call-site to the existing CallStack.
If there is no CallStack in scope -- e.g. in the GHCi session above -- and the enclosing definition does not have an explicit type signature, GHC will infer a HasCallStack constraint for the enclosing definition (subject to the monomorphism restriction).
If there is no CallStack in scope and the enclosing definition has an explicit type signature, GHC will solve the HasCallStack constraint for the singleton CallStack containing just the current call-site.
CallStacks do not interact with the RTS and do not require compilation
with -prof. On the other hand, as they are built up explicitly via the
HasCallStack constraints, they will generally not contain as much
information as the simulated call-stacks maintained by the RTS.
A CallStack is a [(String, SrcLoc)]. The String is the name of
function that was called, the SrcLoc is the call-site. The list is
ordered with the most recently called function at the head.
NOTE: The intrepid user may notice that HasCallStack is just an
alias for an implicit parameter ?callStack :: CallStack. This is an
implementation detail and should not be considered part of the
CallStack API, we may decide to change the implementation in the
future.
Extract a list of call-sites from the CallStack.
The list is ordered by most recent call.
Pretty print a CallStack.