This function does not create a memory barrier and can be reordered
with other independent reads and writes within a thread, which may cause issues
for multithreaded execution. In these cases, consider using atomicWriteIORef
instead. See Data.IORef#memmodel for more details.
This function is useful for using IORef in a safe way in a multithreaded
program. If you only have one IORef, then using atomicModifyIORef to
access and modify it will prevent race conditions.
Extending the atomicity to multiple IORefs is problematic, so it
is recommended that if you need to do anything more complicated
then using Control.Concurrent.MVar.MVar instead is a good idea.
Conceptually,
atomicModifyIORef ref f = do
-- Begin atomic block
old <- readIORef ref
let r = f old
new = fst r
writeIORef ref new
-- End atomic block
case r of
(_new, res) -> pure res
The actions in the section labeled "atomic block" are not subject to
interference from other threads. In particular, it is impossible for the
value in the IORef to change between the readIORef and writeIORef
invocations.
The user-supplied function is applied to the value stored in the IORef,
yielding a new value to store in the IORef and a value to return. After
the new value is (lazily) stored in the IORef, atomicModifyIORef forces
the result pair, but does not force either component of the result. To force
both components, use atomicModifyIORef'.
Note that
atomicModifyIORef ref (_ -> undefined)
will raise an exception in the calling thread, but will also
install the bottoming value in the IORef, where it may be read by
other threads.
This function imposes a memory barrier, preventing reordering around the
"atomic block"; see Data.IORef#memmodel for details.
Variant of writeIORef. The prefix "atomic" relates to a fact that
it imposes a reordering barrier, similar to atomicModifyIORef.
Such a write will not be reordered with other reads
or writes even on CPUs with weak memory model.
Mutate the contents of an IORef, combining readIORef and writeIORef.
This is not an atomic update, consider using atomicModifyIORef when
operating in a multithreaded environment.
Be warned that modifyIORef does not apply the function strictly. This
means if the program calls modifyIORef many times, but seldom uses the
value, thunks will pile up in memory resulting in a space leak. This is a
common mistake made when using an IORef as a counter. For example, the
following will likely produce a stack overflow:
A strict version of atomicModifyIORef. This forces both the
value stored in the IORef and the value returned.
Conceptually,
atomicModifyIORef' ref f = do
-- Begin atomic block
old <- readIORef ref
let r = f old
new = fst r
writeIORef ref new
-- End atomic block
case r of
(!_new, !res) -> pure res
The actions in the "atomic block" are not subject to interference
by other threads. In particular, the value in the IORef cannot
change between the readIORef and writeIORef invocations.
The new value is installed in the IORef before either value is forced.
So
atomicModifyIORef' ref (x -> (x+1, undefined))
will increment the IORef and then throw an exception in the calling
thread.
atomicModifyIORef' ref (x -> (undefined, x))
and
atomicModifyIORef' ref (_ -> undefined)
will each raise an exception in the calling thread, but will also
install the bottoming value in the IORef, where it may be read by
other threads.
This function imposes a memory barrier, preventing reordering around
the "atomic block"; see Data.IORef#memmodel for details.